arXiv daily

Machine Learning (stat.ML)

Mon, 29 May 2023

Other arXiv digests in this category:Thu, 14 Sep 2023; Wed, 13 Sep 2023; Tue, 12 Sep 2023; Mon, 11 Sep 2023; Fri, 08 Sep 2023; Tue, 05 Sep 2023; Fri, 01 Sep 2023; Thu, 31 Aug 2023; Wed, 30 Aug 2023; Tue, 29 Aug 2023; Mon, 28 Aug 2023; Fri, 25 Aug 2023; Thu, 24 Aug 2023; Wed, 23 Aug 2023; Tue, 22 Aug 2023; Mon, 21 Aug 2023; Fri, 18 Aug 2023; Thu, 17 Aug 2023; Wed, 16 Aug 2023; Tue, 15 Aug 2023; Fri, 11 Aug 2023; Thu, 10 Aug 2023; Tue, 08 Aug 2023; Mon, 07 Aug 2023; Fri, 04 Aug 2023; Thu, 03 Aug 2023; Wed, 02 Aug 2023; Tue, 01 Aug 2023; Mon, 31 Jul 2023; Fri, 28 Jul 2023; Thu, 27 Jul 2023; Wed, 26 Jul 2023; Tue, 25 Jul 2023; Mon, 24 Jul 2023; Thu, 20 Jul 2023; Wed, 19 Jul 2023; Tue, 18 Jul 2023; Mon, 17 Jul 2023; Thu, 13 Jul 2023; Wed, 12 Jul 2023; Tue, 11 Jul 2023; Mon, 10 Jul 2023; Fri, 07 Jul 2023; Thu, 06 Jul 2023; Wed, 05 Jul 2023; Tue, 04 Jul 2023; Mon, 03 Jul 2023; Fri, 30 Jun 2023; Thu, 29 Jun 2023; Tue, 27 Jun 2023; Mon, 26 Jun 2023; Fri, 23 Jun 2023; Thu, 22 Jun 2023; Wed, 21 Jun 2023; Tue, 20 Jun 2023; Fri, 16 Jun 2023; Thu, 15 Jun 2023; Tue, 13 Jun 2023; Mon, 12 Jun 2023; Fri, 09 Jun 2023; Thu, 08 Jun 2023; Wed, 07 Jun 2023; Tue, 06 Jun 2023; Mon, 05 Jun 2023; Fri, 02 Jun 2023; Thu, 01 Jun 2023; Wed, 31 May 2023; Tue, 30 May 2023; Fri, 26 May 2023; Thu, 25 May 2023; Wed, 24 May 2023; Tue, 23 May 2023; Mon, 22 May 2023; Fri, 19 May 2023; Thu, 18 May 2023; Wed, 17 May 2023; Tue, 16 May 2023; Mon, 15 May 2023; Fri, 12 May 2023; Thu, 11 May 2023; Wed, 10 May 2023; Tue, 09 May 2023; Mon, 08 May 2023; Fri, 05 May 2023; Thu, 04 May 2023; Wed, 03 May 2023; Tue, 02 May 2023; Mon, 01 May 2023; Fri, 28 Apr 2023; Thu, 27 Apr 2023; Wed, 26 Apr 2023; Tue, 25 Apr 2023; Mon, 24 Apr 2023; Fri, 21 Apr 2023; Thu, 20 Apr 2023; Wed, 19 Apr 2023; Tue, 18 Apr 2023; Mon, 17 Apr 2023; Fri, 14 Apr 2023; Thu, 13 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Mon, 10 Apr 2023
1.Neural Fourier Transform: A General Approach to Equivariant Representation Learning

Authors:Masanori Koyama, Kenji Fukumizu, Kohei Hayashi, Takeru Miyato

Abstract: Symmetry learning has proven to be an effective approach for extracting the hidden structure of data, with the concept of equivariance relation playing the central role. However, most of the current studies are built on architectural theory and corresponding assumptions on the form of data. We propose Neural Fourier Transform (NFT), a general framework of learning the latent linear action of the group without assuming explicit knowledge of how the group acts on data. We present the theoretical foundations of NFT and show that the existence of a linear equivariant feature, which has been assumed ubiquitously in equivariance learning, is equivalent to the existence of a group invariant kernel on the dataspace. We also provide experimental results to demonstrate the application of NFT in typical scenarios with varying levels of knowledge about the acting group.

2.A Bayesian sparse factor model with adaptive posterior concentration

Authors:Ilsang Ohn, Lizhen Lin, Yongdai Kim

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new Bayesian inference method for a high-dimensional sparse factor model that allows both the factor dimensionality and the sparse structure of the loading matrix to be inferred. The novelty is to introduce a certain dependence between the sparsity level and the factor dimensionality, which leads to adaptive posterior concentration while keeping computational tractability. We show that the posterior distribution asymptotically concentrates on the true factor dimensionality, and more importantly, this posterior consistency is adaptive to the sparsity level of the true loading matrix and the noise variance. We also prove that the proposed Bayesian model attains the optimal detection rate of the factor dimensionality in a more general situation than those found in the literature. Moreover, we obtain a near-optimal posterior concentration rate of the covariance matrix. Numerical studies are conducted and show the superiority of the proposed method compared with other competitors.

3.Escaping mediocrity: how two-layer networks learn hard single-index models with SGD

Authors:Luca Arnaboldi, Florent Krzakala, Bruno Loureiro, Ludovic Stephan

Abstract: This study explores the sample complexity for two-layer neural networks to learn a single-index target function under Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), focusing on the challenging regime where many flat directions are present at initialization. It is well-established that in this scenario $n=O(d\log{d})$ samples are typically needed. However, we provide precise results concerning the pre-factors in high-dimensional contexts and for varying widths. Notably, our findings suggest that overparameterization can only enhance convergence by a constant factor within this problem class. These insights are grounded in the reduction of SGD dynamics to a stochastic process in lower dimensions, where escaping mediocrity equates to calculating an exit time. Yet, we demonstrate that a deterministic approximation of this process adequately represents the escape time, implying that the role of stochasticity may be minimal in this scenario.

4.Generalization Ability of Wide Residual Networks

Authors:Jianfa Lai, Zixiong Yu, Songtao Tian, Qian Lin

Abstract: In this paper, we study the generalization ability of the wide residual network on $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ with the ReLU activation function. We first show that as the width $m\rightarrow\infty$, the residual network kernel (RNK) uniformly converges to the residual neural tangent kernel (RNTK). This uniform convergence further guarantees that the generalization error of the residual network converges to that of the kernel regression with respect to the RNTK. As direct corollaries, we then show $i)$ the wide residual network with the early stopping strategy can achieve the minimax rate provided that the target regression function falls in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) associated with the RNTK; $ii)$ the wide residual network can not generalize well if it is trained till overfitting the data. We finally illustrate some experiments to reconcile the contradiction between our theoretical result and the widely observed ``benign overfitting phenomenon''

5.Learning Two-Layer Neural Networks, One (Giant) Step at a Time

Authors:Yatin Dandi, Florent Krzakala, Bruno Loureiro, Luca Pesce, Ludovic Stephan

Abstract: We study the training dynamics of shallow neural networks, investigating the conditions under which a limited number of large batch gradient descent steps can facilitate feature learning beyond the kernel regime. We compare the influence of batch size and that of multiple (but finitely many) steps. Our analysis of a single-step process reveals that while a batch size of $n = O(d)$ enables feature learning, it is only adequate for learning a single direction, or a single-index model. In contrast, $n = O(d^2)$ is essential for learning multiple directions and specialization. Moreover, we demonstrate that ``hard'' directions, which lack the first $\ell$ Hermite coefficients, remain unobserved and require a batch size of $n = O(d^\ell)$ for being captured by gradient descent. Upon iterating a few steps, the scenario changes: a batch-size of $n = O(d)$ is enough to learn new target directions spanning the subspace linearly connected in the Hermite basis to the previously learned directions, thereby a staircase property. Our analysis utilizes a blend of techniques related to concentration, projection-based conditioning, and Gaussian equivalence that are of independent interest. By determining the conditions necessary for learning and specialization, our results highlight the interaction between batch size and number of iterations, and lead to a hierarchical depiction where learning performance exhibits a stairway to accuracy over time and batch size, shedding new light on feature learning in neural networks.