
Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Wed, 02 Aug 2023
1.Causal Inference with Differentially Private (Clustered) Outcomes
Authors:Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni, Jean Pouget-Abadie
Abstract: Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only feasible if participants agree to reveal their potentially sensitive responses. Of the many ways of ensuring privacy, label differential privacy is a widely used measure of an algorithm's privacy guarantee, which might encourage participants to share responses without running the risk of de-anonymization. Many differentially private mechanisms inject noise into the original data-set to achieve this privacy guarantee, which increases the variance of most statistical estimators and makes the precise measurement of causal effects difficult: there exists a fundamental privacy-variance trade-off to performing causal analyses from differentially private data. With the aim of achieving lower variance for stronger privacy guarantees, we suggest a new differential privacy mechanism, "Cluster-DP", which leverages any given cluster structure of the data while still allowing for the estimation of causal effects. We show that, depending on an intuitive measure of cluster quality, we can improve the variance loss while maintaining our privacy guarantees. We compare its performance, theoretically and empirically, to that of its unclustered version and a more extreme uniform-prior version which does not use any of the original response distribution, both of which are special cases of the "Cluster-DP" algorithm.
2.Simulation-based inference using surjective sequential neural likelihood estimation
Authors:Simon Dirmeier, Carlo Albert, Fernando Perez-Cruz
Abstract: We present Surjective Sequential Neural Likelihood (SSNL) estimation, a novel method for simulation-based inference in models where the evaluation of the likelihood function is not tractable and only a simulator that can generate synthetic data is available. SSNL fits a dimensionality-reducing surjective normalizing flow model and uses it as a surrogate likelihood function which allows for conventional Bayesian inference using either Markov chain Monte Carlo methods or variational inference. By embedding the data in a low-dimensional space, SSNL solves several issues previous likelihood-based methods had when applied to high-dimensional data sets that, for instance, contain non-informative data dimensions or lie along a lower-dimensional manifold. We evaluate SSNL on a wide variety of experiments and show that it generally outperforms contemporary methods used in simulation-based inference, for instance, on a challenging real-world example from astrophysics which models the magnetic field strength of the sun using a solar dynamo model.
3.LLMs Understand Glass-Box Models, Discover Surprises, and Suggest Repairs
Authors:Benjamin J. Lengerich, Sebastian Bordt, Harsha Nori, Mark E. Nunnally, Yin Aphinyanaphongs, Manolis Kellis, Rich Caruana
Abstract: We show that large language models (LLMs) are remarkably good at working with interpretable models that decompose complex outcomes into univariate graph-represented components. By adopting a hierarchical approach to reasoning, LLMs can provide comprehensive model-level summaries without ever requiring the entire model to fit in context. This approach enables LLMs to apply their extensive background knowledge to automate common tasks in data science such as detecting anomalies that contradict prior knowledge, describing potential reasons for the anomalies, and suggesting repairs that would remove the anomalies. We use multiple examples in healthcare to demonstrate the utility of these new capabilities of LLMs, with particular emphasis on Generalized Additive Models (GAMs). Finally, we present the package $\texttt{TalkToEBM}$ as an open-source LLM-GAM interface.
4.Global Hierarchical Neural Networks using Hierarchical Softmax
Authors:Jetze Schuurmans, Flavius Frasincar
Abstract: This paper presents a framework in which hierarchical softmax is used to create a global hierarchical classifier. The approach is applicable for any classification task where there is a natural hierarchy among classes. We show empirical results on four text classification datasets. In all datasets the hierarchical softmax improved on the regular softmax used in a flat classifier in terms of macro-F1 and macro-recall. In three out of four datasets hierarchical softmax achieved a higher micro-accuracy and macro-precision.