Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Abstract: Deep learning-based recommender systems (DRSs) are increasingly and widely deployed in the industry, which brings significant convenience to people's daily life in different ways. However, recommender systems are also shown to suffer from multiple issues,e.g., the echo chamber and the Matthew effect, of which the notation of "fairness" plays a core role.While many fairness notations and corresponding fairness testing approaches have been developed for traditional deep classification models, they are essentially hardly applicable to DRSs. One major difficulty is that there still lacks a systematic understanding and mapping between the existing fairness notations and the diverse testing requirements for deep recommender systems, not to mention further testing or debugging activities. To address the gap, we propose FairRec, a unified framework that supports fairness testing of DRSs from multiple customized perspectives, e.g., model utility, item diversity, item popularity, etc. We also propose a novel, efficient search-based testing approach to tackle the new challenge, i.e., double-ended discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm, to effectively search for hidden fairness issues in the form of certain disadvantaged groups from a vast number of candidate groups. Given the testing report, by adopting a simple re-ranking mitigation strategy on these identified disadvantaged groups, we show that the fairness of DRSs can be significantly improved. We conducted extensive experiments on multiple industry-level DRSs adopted by leading companies. The results confirm that FairRec is effective and efficient in identifying the deeply hidden fairness issues, e.g., achieving 95% testing accuracy with half to 1/8 time.

Abstract: Reasoning on knowledge graphs is a challenging task because it utilizes observed information to predict the missing one. Specifically, answering first-order logic formulas is of particular interest because of its clear syntax and semantics. Recently, the query embedding method has been proposed which learns the embedding of a set of entities and treats logic operations as set operations. Though there has been much research following the same methodology, it lacks a systematic inspection from the standpoint of logic. In this paper, we characterize the scope of queries investigated previously and precisely identify the gap between it and the whole family of existential formulas. Moreover, we develop a new dataset containing ten new formulas and discuss the new challenges coming simultaneously. Finally, we propose a new search algorithm from fuzzy logic theory which is capable of solving new formulas and outperforming the previous methods in existing formulas.

Abstract: A key challenge for a reinforcement learning (RL) agent is to incorporate external/expert1 advice in its learning. The desired goals of an algorithm that can shape the learning of an RL agent with external advice include (a) maintaining policy invariance; (b) accelerating the learning of the agent; and (c) learning from arbitrary advice [3]. To address this challenge this paper formulates the problem of incorporating external advice in RL as a multi-armed bandit called shaping-bandits. The reward of each arm of shaping bandits corresponds to the return obtained by following the expert or by following a default RL algorithm learning on the true environment reward.We show that directly applying existing bandit and shaping algorithms that do not reason about the non-stationary nature of the underlying returns can lead to poor results. Thus we propose UCB-PIES (UPIES), Racing-PIES (RPIES), and Lazy PIES (LPIES) three different shaping algorithms built on different assumptions that reason about the long-term consequences of following the expert policy or the default RL algorithm. Our experiments in four different settings show that these proposed algorithms achieve the above-mentioned goals whereas the other algorithms fail to do so.

Abstract: GPT-3 and several other language models (LMs) can effectively address various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, including machine translation and text summarization. Recently, they have also been successfully employed in the business process management (BPM) domain, e.g., for predictive process monitoring and process extraction from text. This, however, typically requires fine-tuning the employed LM, which, among others, necessitates large amounts of suitable training data. A possible solution to this problem is the use of prompt engineering, which leverages pre-trained LMs without fine-tuning them. Recognizing this, we argue that prompt engineering can help bring the capabilities of LMs to BPM research. We use this position paper to develop a research agenda for the use of prompt engineering for BPM research by identifying the associated potentials and challenges.