Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)

Abstract: Selective attention allows to process stimuli which are behaviorally relevant, while attenuating distracting information. However, it is an open question what mechanisms implement selective routing, and how they are engaged in dependence on behavioral need. Here we introduce a novel framework for selective processing by spontaneous synchronization. Input signals become organized into 'avalanches' of synchronized spikes which propagate to target populations. Selective attention enhances spontaneous synchronization and boosts signal transfer by a simple disinhibition of a control population, without requiring changes in synaptic weights. Our framework is fully analytically tractable and provides a complete understanding of all stages of the routing mechanism, yielding closed-form expressions for input-output correlations. Interestingly, although gamma oscillations can naturally occur through a recurrent dynamics, we can formally show that the routing mechanism itself does not require such oscillatory activity and works equally well if synchronous events would be randomly shuffled over time. Our framework explains a large range of physiological findings in a unified framework and makes specific predictions about putative control mechanisms and their effects on neural dynamics.

Abstract: When selective attention is devoted to one of multiple stimuli within receptive fields of neurons in visual area V4, cells respond as if only the attended stimulus was present. The underlying neural mechanisms are still debated, but computational studies suggest that a small rate advantage for neural populations passing the attended signal to V4 suffices to establish such selective processing. We challenged this theory by pairing stimuli with different luminance contrasts, such that attention on a weak target stimulus would have to overcome a large activation difference to a strong distracter. In this situation we found unexpectedly large attentional target facilitation in macaque V1/V2 which far surpasses known magnitudes of attentional modulation. Target facilitation scales with contrast difference and combines with distracter suppression to achieve the required rate advantage. These effects can be explained by a contrast-independent attentional control mechanism with excitatory centre and suppressive surround targeting divisive normalization units.