1.Toward Whole-Brain Minimally-Invasive Vascular Imaging

Authors:Anatole Jimenez PhysMed Paris, Bruno Osmanski PhIND, Denis Vivien PhIND, Mickael Tanter PhysMed Paris, Thomas Gaberel PhIND, Thomas Deffieux PhysMed Paris

Abstract: Imaging the brain vasculature can be critical for cerebral perfusion monitoring in the context of neurocritical care. Although ultrasensitive Doppler (UD) can provide good sensitivity to cerebral blood volume (CBV) in a large field of view, it remains difficult to perform through the skull. In this work, we investigate how a minimally invasive burr hole, performed for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, could be used to map the entire brain vascular tree. We explored the use of a small motorized phased array probe with a non-implantable preclinical prototype in pigs. The scan duration (18 min) and coverage (62 $\pm$ 12 % of the brain) obtained allowed global CBV variations detection (relative in brain Dopplerdecrease =-3[-4-+16]% \& Dopplerincrease. = +1[-3-+15]%, n = 6 \& 5) and stroke detection (relative in core Dopplerstroke. =-25%, n = 1). This technology could one day be miniaturized to be implanted for brain perfusion monitoring in neurocritical care.

2.Identifying epileptogenic abnormalities through spatial clustering of MEG interictal band power

Authors:Thomas W. Owen, Vytene Janiukstyte, Gerard R. Hall, Jonathan J. Horsley, Andrew McEvoy, Anna Miserocchi, Jane de Tisi, John S. Duncan, Fergus Rugg-Gunn, Yujiang Wang, Peter N. Taylor

Abstract: Successful epilepsy surgery depends on localising and resecting cerebral abnormalities and networks that generate seizures. Abnormalities, however, may be widely distributed across multiple discontiguous areas. We propose spatially constrained clusters as candidate areas for further investigation, and potential resection. We quantified the spatial overlap between the abnormality cluster and subsequent resection, hypothesising a greater overlap in seizure-free patients. Thirty-four individuals with refractory focal epilepsy underwent pre-surgical resting-state interictal MEG recording. Fourteen individuals were totally seizure free (ILAE 1) after surgery and 20 continued to have some seizures post-operatively (ILAE 2+). Band power abnormality maps were derived using controls as a baseline. Patient abnormalities were spatially clustered using the k-means algorithm. The tissue within the cluster containing the most abnormal region was compared with the resection volume using the dice score. The proposed abnormality cluster overlapped with the resection in 71% of ILAE 1 patients. Conversely, an overlap only occurred in 15% of ILAE 2+ patients. This effect discriminated outcome groups well (AUC=0.82). Our novel approach identifies clusters of spatially similar tissue with high abnormality. This is clinically valuable, providing (i) a data-driven framework to validate current hypotheses of the epileptogenic zone localisation or (ii) to guide further investigation.

3.Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome

Authors:Thomas W. Owen, Vytene Janiukstyte, Gerard R. Hall, Fahmida A. Chowdhury, Beate Diehl, Andrew McEvoy, Anna Miserocchi, Jane de Tisi, John S. Duncan, Fergus Rugg-Gunn, Yujiang Wang, Peter N. Taylor

Abstract: Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localisation, but requires a hypothesis of which tissue is epileptogenic, guided by qualitative analysis of seizure semiology and other imaging modalities such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). We hypothesised that if quantifiable MEG band power abnormalities were sampled by iEEG, then patients' post-resection seizure outcome were better. Thirty-two individuals with neocortical epilepsy underwent MEG and iEEG recordings as part of pre-surgical evaluation. Interictal MEG band power abnormalities were derived using 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline. MEG abnormality maps were compared to electrode implantation, with the spatial overlap of iEEG electrodes and MEG abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue, and resection of the strongest abnormalities determined by MEG and iEEG explained surgical outcome. Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal MEG findings in individuals that were seizure-free post-resection (T=3.9, p=0.003). The overlap between MEG abnormalities and iEEG electrodes distinguished outcome groups moderately well (AUC=0.68). In isolation, the resection of the strongest MEG and iEEG abnormalities separated surgical outcome groups well (AUC=0.71, AUC=0.74 respectively). A model incorporating all three features separated outcome groups best (AUC=0.80). Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the EZ and help render patients seizure-free after resection. We showed that data-driven abnormalities derived from interictal MEG recordings have clinical value and may help guide electrode placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Finally, our predictive model of post-operative seizure-freedom, which leverages both MEG and iEEG recordings, may aid patient counselling of expected outcome.