Scaling and ecomorphology of lagomorph body shape and appendicular skeleton

Avatar
Poster
Voice is AI-generated
Connected to paperThis paper is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review

Scaling and ecomorphology of lagomorph body shape and appendicular skeleton

Authors

Huizenga, C.; Brice, N.; Law, C. J.

Abstract

The diversity of body shapes is one of the most prominent features of phenotypic variation in mammals. Yet, mammalian body shapes are poorly quantified and the underlying components contributing to its diversity as well as its relationship to other components of the skeleton are rarely tested. Here, we use lagomorphs (hares, rabbits and pikas) as a model system to (1) investigate which components of the skeleton contributed the most to body shape diversity, (2) examine the relationships between body shape and relative limb lengths, and (3) test how body size, ecotype, burrowing behavior, and locomotor mode influenced variation in lagomorph body shape and appendicular morphology. We quantified the body shape and functional proxies of the appendicular skeleton in 40 lagomorph species from osteological specimens held at museum collections. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we found the relative length of the ribs and elongation or shortening of the thoracic and lumbar regions contributed the most to body shape evolution across lagomorphs. Second, we found that only leporids (hares and rabbits) exhibited a significant relationship between limb length and body shape, where more elongate species exhibit relatively shorter forelimbs and hindlimbs. Lastly, we found that models incorporating body size were the best predictors of lagomorph body shape and the majority of the appendicular traits, whereas models incorporating burrowing behavior and locomotor mode were largely poor fits. Broadly, these results indicate that larger lagomorphs tend to exhibit more robust body shapes with longer, more gracile forelimbs, whereas smaller lagomorphs tend to exhibit more elongate body shapes with shorter, more robust forelimbs. Overall, this work contributes to the growing understanding of mammalian body shape evolution and demonstrates the importance of not omitting body size in ecomorphological analyses.

Follow Us on

0 comments

Add comment