Ogino, M.; Nyaguthii, B.; Papageorgiou, D.; Farine, D.

Animals often use consistent areas. Some are territorial, restricting their space use within territorial boundaries, whereas others at not territorial animals but still restrict their space use despite not being constrained by surrounding conspecifics. Staying within a familiar area can provide a range of benefits, such as using previous knowledge (i.e. memory) to efficiently exploit resources or because they can consistently return to key locations (such as a nest or sleeping site). In group-living animals, consistent space use could reduce the complexity of decision-making time (e.g. by choosing among known foraging sites), facilitating group cohesion. However, to date, little research has explicitly asked what factors determine whether groups use consistent areas. Here we used repeated movements by groups of vulturine guineafowl (Acryllium vulturinum)--leaving and returning back to the same areas in response to seasonal conditions--to examine and disentangle social processes from spatial and ecological factors that might shape the distribution of animals over space. Specifically, we quantified (i) how groups distribute themselves over the landscape, (ii) if their space use is consistent across seasons with similar environmental conditions, (iii) how different social and spatial factors shape the consistency of space use by groups over time, and (iv) how social and spatial factors affect home range overlap between groups. We found that groups were highly consistent in their space use over time and that home ranges were distinct across groups. Fidelity to the core home range area was higher when group composition was more stable, while overall home range fidelity was higher when groups recently experienced milder ecological conditions. Overlap in core areas and the overall home ranges among groups were greater among groups that shared roosts and groups that were fused in the previous season. Home range overlap was also lowest during long intermediate seasons (i.e. a sampling period that immediately follows intermediate season conditions, as opposed to sampling periods that followed dry or wet conditions), suggesting that extended intermediate conditions allow groups to increasingly partition their overall space use. These results provide insights into how the movement decisions by groups, the distribution of animals, and group-level space use emerge, and the role of social and ecological conditions as potential precursors to territoriality.