Springer, K.; Manning, P.; Boesing, A. L.; Ammer, C.; Fiore-Donno, A. M.; Fischer, M.; Goldmann, K.; Le Provost, G.; Overmann, J.; Ruess, L.; Schoening, I.; Seibold, S.; Sikorski, J.; Neyret, M.

Ecosystems worldwide face threats related to human-driven degradation, climate change, and biodiversity loss. Addressing these challenges requires management strategies that combine biodiversity conservation with climate change mitigation. Here, we aimed to identify local-scale management actions that promote biodiversity at multiple trophic levels while also promoting carbon storage and sequestration. We combined data on the diversity of nine taxonomic groups (plants, birds, moths, Mollusca, soil fungi, active soil bacteria, Cercozoan and Endomyxan soil protists, Oomycotan soil protists, and nematodes), with above- and belowground carbon storage in 150 temperate forest plots in three regions of Germany. These were dominated by European beech, pine, spruce and oak. We investigated the relationships between multiple forest structure and management variables, biodiversity and carbon storage and sequestration in forest plots with different management types. Carbon storage was 32% higher in uneven-aged than even-aged forests and increased with mean tree diameter, while carbon sequestration in trees was 15% higher in even-aged than uneven-aged stands. Mean tree diameter was positively related to overall biodiversity, especially bird species richness and the richness of forest specialist birds. Oak- or beech-dominated stands also harboured higher biodiversity. One exception to this was the richness of plant and forest specialist plants species, which were highest in spruce plantations. Surprisingly, deadwood input did not significantly affect the diversity of any taxonomic group. By showing that older forests with a high proportion of uneven-aged deciduous trees, or oak-dominated forests, can promote both biodiversity and carbon storage, our results could inform local-scale forest management in Central Europe that promotes both biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. These findings can form the basis of further larger-scale studies investigating such relations at larger spatial scales to inform landscape-level recommendations for sustainable forest management.