Morris, J.; Rivas-Sanchez, D. F.; Elkin, J.; Hickey, A.; Fischer, B.; Marconi, A.; Durbin, R.; Turner, G. F.; Santos, M. E.; Montgomery, S. H.

How evolutionary and developmental processes interact to determine axes of neural variation that produce behavioural diversity has been debated for many decades, with alternative hypotheses giving differential emphasis to functional coupling, which favours co-evolution, and developmental constraint, which enforces it. A critical omission is data on the genetic architecture of brain size and structure, which more closely illuminates the shared developmental dependencies between components of an integrated system. Here, we exploit ecological divergence between Astatotilapia calliptera and Aulonocara stuartgranti, two closely related cichlid species from Lake Malawi, to explore the genetic architecture of brain evolution. Using computer vision and machine learning techniques to extract volumetric data from micro-tomographic images, we first demonstrate significant divergence in brain composition between these species. Genomic and micro-tomographic imaging data from a population of hybrids generated between the two species were used to investigate genetic factors shaping this differentiation. We show that the majority of brain components are integrated phenotypically in hybrids, but genetic correlations between them are generally weaker. We further show that variation in multiple brain components is associated with variation in largely structure-specific quantitative trait loci, rather than determined by genetic factors with broad effects across the entire brain. These results suggest a genetic architecture that can facilitate modular changes in brain structure, and imply that individual components are independently evolvable.