A canonical four-state macro-architecture governs multimodal fear-goal arbitration across learning and relapse

Avatar
Poster
Voice is AI-generated
Connected to paperThis paper is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review

A canonical four-state macro-architecture governs multimodal fear-goal arbitration across learning and relapse

Authors

Yin, B.; Rao, J.; Wang, X. T.

Abstract

Fear, safety, and goal pursuit are often studied with separate behavioral readouts, leaving open whether multimodal behavior is organized by continuous response intensity or by discrete latent modes. We reconstructed a four-channel, 5-s time-binned rat dataset spanning fear learning, threat generalization, long-delay retest, extinction, retrieval, and renewal. The primary complete-case analysis contained 47,004 four-channel bins from 29 rats and 213 subject-sessions. We compared continuous latent-factor baselines with hidden Markov and semi-Markov sequence models using freezing, 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations, 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations, and lever pressing. Discrete sequence models strongly outperformed PCA/factor-analysis baselines. Although empirical fit improved up to eight microstates, these states coarse-grained into four biologically interpretable macro-modes: Quiescent/Baseline, Safety/Appetitive, Danger/Fear, and Goal-directed behavior. The four-state macro-model captured 96% of the optimal cross-validated likelihood and was highly stable across random initializations and leave-one-subject-out validation. Across conditioning, extinction, and renewal, emission signatures remained comparatively stable while transition matrices reconfigured strongly. Session-level fecal boli were predicted by decoded state occupancy better than mean freezing alone. These findings support a canonical discrete macro-architecture for fear-goal arbitration, with learning and relapse expressed primarily as context-dependent transition reweighting.

Follow Us on

0 comments

Add comment