arXiv daily

Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)

Thu, 11 May 2023

Other arXiv digests in this category:Thu, 14 Sep 2023; Wed, 13 Sep 2023; Tue, 12 Sep 2023; Mon, 11 Sep 2023; Fri, 08 Sep 2023; Tue, 05 Sep 2023; Fri, 01 Sep 2023; Thu, 31 Aug 2023; Wed, 30 Aug 2023; Tue, 29 Aug 2023; Mon, 28 Aug 2023; Fri, 25 Aug 2023; Thu, 24 Aug 2023; Wed, 23 Aug 2023; Tue, 22 Aug 2023; Mon, 21 Aug 2023; Fri, 18 Aug 2023; Thu, 17 Aug 2023; Wed, 16 Aug 2023; Tue, 15 Aug 2023; Mon, 14 Aug 2023; Fri, 11 Aug 2023; Thu, 10 Aug 2023; Wed, 09 Aug 2023; Tue, 08 Aug 2023; Mon, 07 Aug 2023; Fri, 04 Aug 2023; Thu, 03 Aug 2023; Wed, 02 Aug 2023; Tue, 01 Aug 2023; Mon, 31 Jul 2023; Fri, 28 Jul 2023; Thu, 27 Jul 2023; Wed, 26 Jul 2023; Tue, 25 Jul 2023; Mon, 24 Jul 2023; Fri, 21 Jul 2023; Wed, 19 Jul 2023; Tue, 18 Jul 2023; Mon, 17 Jul 2023; Fri, 14 Jul 2023; Thu, 13 Jul 2023; Wed, 12 Jul 2023; Tue, 11 Jul 2023; Mon, 10 Jul 2023; Fri, 07 Jul 2023; Thu, 06 Jul 2023; Wed, 05 Jul 2023; Tue, 04 Jul 2023; Mon, 03 Jul 2023; Fri, 30 Jun 2023; Thu, 29 Jun 2023; Wed, 28 Jun 2023; Tue, 27 Jun 2023; Mon, 26 Jun 2023; Fri, 23 Jun 2023; Thu, 22 Jun 2023; Wed, 21 Jun 2023; Tue, 20 Jun 2023; Fri, 16 Jun 2023; Thu, 15 Jun 2023; Tue, 13 Jun 2023; Mon, 12 Jun 2023; Fri, 09 Jun 2023; Thu, 08 Jun 2023; Wed, 07 Jun 2023; Tue, 06 Jun 2023; Mon, 05 Jun 2023; Fri, 02 Jun 2023; Thu, 01 Jun 2023; Wed, 31 May 2023; Tue, 30 May 2023; Mon, 29 May 2023; Fri, 26 May 2023; Thu, 25 May 2023; Wed, 24 May 2023; Tue, 23 May 2023; Mon, 22 May 2023; Fri, 19 May 2023; Thu, 18 May 2023; Wed, 17 May 2023; Tue, 16 May 2023; Mon, 15 May 2023; Fri, 12 May 2023; Wed, 10 May 2023; Tue, 09 May 2023; Mon, 08 May 2023; Fri, 05 May 2023; Thu, 04 May 2023; Wed, 03 May 2023; Tue, 02 May 2023; Mon, 01 May 2023; Fri, 28 Apr 2023; Thu, 27 Apr 2023; Wed, 26 Apr 2023; Tue, 25 Apr 2023; Mon, 24 Apr 2023; Fri, 21 Apr 2023; Thu, 20 Apr 2023; Wed, 19 Apr 2023; Tue, 18 Apr 2023; Mon, 17 Apr 2023; Fri, 14 Apr 2023; Thu, 13 Apr 2023; Wed, 12 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Mon, 10 Apr 2023
1.Exploring connections between the VLBI and optical morphology of AGNs and their host galaxies

Authors:David Fernández Gil, Jeffrey A. Hodgson, Benjamin L'Huillier

Abstract: We analyse VLBI and optical images of AGNs and their host galaxies and look for statistical correlations between the shape and orientation of the galaxy and the direction of the jet. We utilise the Astrogeo catalogue, which has over 9000 VLBI sources, many of those with a clear core-jet like structure that allows for the jet position angle to be reliably determined. We then use the VLBI source positions to search for optical counterparts within various optical surveys. In order to parameterise the orientation and shape of the host galaxy, we fitted a Gaussian elliptical model to the optical image, taking the PSF into account. We check our own shape parameters from this fit against the ones provided by the optical surveys. As of yet, no clear correlation between the galaxy morphology and the jet direction is seen.

2.Detection of multiple phase space overdensities of GSE stars by orbit integration

Authors:WenboWu, GangZhao, JiangChang, Xiang-XiangXue, YuqinChen, ChengdongLi, Xianhao Ye, Chengqun Yang

Abstract: In N-body simulations, nearly radial mergers can form shell-like overdensities in the sky position and phase space ($r-v_r$) due to the combination of dynamical friction and tidal stripping. The merger event of Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus has provided a unique opportunity to study the shells in the phase space. To search for them, we integrate the orbits of 5949 GSE-related halo K giants from the LAMOST survey and record their positions at all time intervals in $r-v_r$ diagram. After the subtraction of a smoothed background, we find six significant and complete thin chevron-like overdensities. The apocenters $r_\mathrm{apo}$ of stars in the six chevrons are around 6.75, 12.75, 18.75, 25.25, 27.25, and 30.25 kpc. These chevrons reveal the multiple pile-ups of GSE stars at different apocenters. The application of a different Milky Way mass $M_\mathrm{vir}$ will change the opening angles of these chevrons, while leave their apocenters almost unchanged. By comparing with a recent study of the phase space overdensities of local halo stars from Gaia RVS survey, our results are more inclined to a medium $M_\mathrm{vir}$ of $10^{12}\,M_\odot$. The application of a non-axisymmetric Galactic potential with a steadily rotating bar has a blurring effect on the appearance of these chevron-like overdensities, especially for the chevrons with $r_\mathrm{apo} > 20$ kpc.

3.QUIJOTE scientific results -- X. Spatial variations of Anomalous Microwave Emission along the Galactic plane

Authors:M. Fernández-Torreiro, J. A. Rubiño-Martín, C. H. López-Caraballo, R. T. Génova-Santos, M. W. Peel, F. Guidi, S. E. Harper, E. Artal, M. Ashdown, R. B. Barreiro, F. J. Casas, E. de la Hoz, D. Herranz, R. Hoyland, A. Lasenby, E. Martínez-Gonzalez, L. Piccirillo, F. Poidevin, R. Rebolo, B. Ruiz-Granados, D. Tramonte, F. Vansyngel, P. Vielva, R. A. Watson

Abstract: Anomalous Microwave Emission (AME) is an important emission component between 10 and 60 GHz that is not yet fully understood. It seems to be ubiquituous in our Galaxy and is observed at a broad range of angular scales. Here we use the new QUIJOTE-MFI wide survey data at 11, 13, 17 and 19 GHz to constrain the AME in the Galactic plane ($|b|<10^\circ$) on degree scales. We built the spectral energy distribution between 0.408 and 3000 GHz for each of the 5309 0.9$^\circ$, pixels in the Galactic plane, and fitted a parametric model by considering five emission components: synchrotron, free-free, AME, thermal dust and CMB anisotropies. We show that not including QUIJOTE-MFI data points leads to the underestimation (up to 50 %) of the AME signal in favour of free-free emission. The parameters describing these components are then intercompared, looking for relations that help to understand AME physical processes. We find median values for the AME width, $W_{\rm AME}$, and for its peak frequency, $\nu_{\rm AME}$, respectively of $0.560^{+0.059}_{-0.050}$ and $20.7^{+2.0}_{-1.9}$ GHz, slightly in tension with current theoretical models. We find spatial variations throughout the Galactic plane for $\nu_{\rm AME}$, but only with reduced statistical significance. We report correlations of AME parameters with certain ISM properties, such as that between the AME emissivity (which shows variations with the Galactic longitude) and the interstellar radiation field, and that between the AME peak frequency and dust temperature. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results on the possible molecules responsible for AME.

4.Halo mass-observable proxy scaling relations and their dependencies on galaxy and group properties

Authors:Ziwen Zhang, Huiyuan Wang, Wentao Luo, Houjun Mo, Jun Zhang, Xiaohu Yang, Hao Li, Qinxun Li

Abstract: Based on the DECaLS shear catalog, we study the scaling relations between halo mass($M_{\rm h}$) and various proxies for SDSS central galaxies, including stellar mass($M_*$), stellar velocity dispersion($\sigma_*$), abundance matching halo mass($M_{\rm AM}$) and satellite velocity dispersion($\sigma_{\rm s}$), and their dependencies on galaxy and group properties. In general, they are all good proxies of $M_{\rm h}$, and their scaling relations are consistent with previous studies. We find that the $M_{\rm h}$-$M_*$ and $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_*$ relations depend strongly on group richness($N_{\rm sat}$), while the $M_{\rm h}$-$M_{\rm AM}$ and $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_{\rm s}$ relations are independent of it. Moreover, the dependence on star formation rate(SFR) is rather weak in the $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_*$ and $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_{\rm s}$ relations, but very prominent in the other two. $\sigma_{\rm s}$ is thus the best proxy among them, and its scaling relation is in good agreement with hydro-dynamical simulations. However, estimating $\sigma_{\rm s}$ accurately for individual groups/clusters is challenging because of interlopers and the requirement for sufficient satellites. We construct new proxies by combining $M_*$, $\sigma_*$, and $M_{\rm AM}$, and find the proxy with 30\% contribution from $M_{\rm AM}$ and 70\% from $\sigma_*$ can minimize the dependence on $N_{\rm sat}$ and SFR. We obtain the $M_{\rm h}$-supermassive black hole(SMBH) mass relation via the SMBH scaling relation and find indications for rapid and linear growth phases for SMBH. We also find that correlations among $M_{\rm h}$, $M_*$ and $\sigma_*$ change with $M_*$, indicating that different processes drive the growth of galaxies and SMBH at different stages.