arXiv daily

Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)

Wed, 23 Aug 2023

Other arXiv digests in this category:Thu, 14 Sep 2023; Wed, 13 Sep 2023; Tue, 12 Sep 2023; Mon, 11 Sep 2023; Fri, 08 Sep 2023; Tue, 05 Sep 2023; Fri, 01 Sep 2023; Thu, 31 Aug 2023; Wed, 30 Aug 2023; Tue, 29 Aug 2023; Mon, 28 Aug 2023; Fri, 25 Aug 2023; Thu, 24 Aug 2023; Tue, 22 Aug 2023; Mon, 21 Aug 2023; Fri, 18 Aug 2023; Thu, 17 Aug 2023; Wed, 16 Aug 2023; Tue, 15 Aug 2023; Mon, 14 Aug 2023; Fri, 11 Aug 2023; Thu, 10 Aug 2023; Wed, 09 Aug 2023; Tue, 08 Aug 2023; Mon, 07 Aug 2023; Fri, 04 Aug 2023; Thu, 03 Aug 2023; Wed, 02 Aug 2023; Tue, 01 Aug 2023; Mon, 31 Jul 2023; Fri, 28 Jul 2023; Thu, 27 Jul 2023; Wed, 26 Jul 2023; Tue, 25 Jul 2023; Mon, 24 Jul 2023; Fri, 21 Jul 2023; Wed, 19 Jul 2023; Tue, 18 Jul 2023; Mon, 17 Jul 2023; Fri, 14 Jul 2023; Thu, 13 Jul 2023; Wed, 12 Jul 2023; Tue, 11 Jul 2023; Mon, 10 Jul 2023; Fri, 07 Jul 2023; Thu, 06 Jul 2023; Wed, 05 Jul 2023; Tue, 04 Jul 2023; Mon, 03 Jul 2023; Fri, 30 Jun 2023; Thu, 29 Jun 2023; Wed, 28 Jun 2023; Tue, 27 Jun 2023; Mon, 26 Jun 2023; Fri, 23 Jun 2023; Thu, 22 Jun 2023; Wed, 21 Jun 2023; Tue, 20 Jun 2023; Fri, 16 Jun 2023; Thu, 15 Jun 2023; Tue, 13 Jun 2023; Mon, 12 Jun 2023; Fri, 09 Jun 2023; Thu, 08 Jun 2023; Wed, 07 Jun 2023; Tue, 06 Jun 2023; Mon, 05 Jun 2023; Fri, 02 Jun 2023; Thu, 01 Jun 2023; Wed, 31 May 2023; Tue, 30 May 2023; Mon, 29 May 2023; Fri, 26 May 2023; Thu, 25 May 2023; Wed, 24 May 2023; Tue, 23 May 2023; Mon, 22 May 2023; Fri, 19 May 2023; Thu, 18 May 2023; Wed, 17 May 2023; Tue, 16 May 2023; Mon, 15 May 2023; Fri, 12 May 2023; Thu, 11 May 2023; Wed, 10 May 2023; Tue, 09 May 2023; Mon, 08 May 2023; Fri, 05 May 2023; Thu, 04 May 2023; Wed, 03 May 2023; Tue, 02 May 2023; Mon, 01 May 2023; Fri, 28 Apr 2023; Thu, 27 Apr 2023; Wed, 26 Apr 2023; Tue, 25 Apr 2023; Mon, 24 Apr 2023; Fri, 21 Apr 2023; Thu, 20 Apr 2023; Wed, 19 Apr 2023; Tue, 18 Apr 2023; Mon, 17 Apr 2023; Fri, 14 Apr 2023; Thu, 13 Apr 2023; Wed, 12 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Mon, 10 Apr 2023
1.Predicting the Yields of $z$ > 6.5 Quasar Surveys in the Era of Roman and Rubin

Authors:Wei Leong Tee, Xiaohui Fan, Feige Wang, Jinyi Yang, Sangeeta Malhotra, James E. Rhoads

Abstract: Around 70 $z>6.5$ luminous quasars have been discovered, strongly biased toward the bright end, thus not providing a comprehensive view on quasar abundance beyond cosmic dawn. We present the predicted results of Roman/Rubin high-redshift quasar survey, yielding 3 times more, $2-4$ magnitudes deeper quasar samples, probing high-redshift quasars across broad range of luminosities, especially faint quasars at $L_\mathrm{bol}\sim 10^{10}\;L_{\odot}$ or $M_\mathrm{1450} \sim-22$ that are currently poorly explored. We include high-$z$ quasars, galactic dwarfs and low-$z$ compact galaxies with similar colors as quasar candidates. We create mock catalogs based on population models to evaluate selection completeness and efficiency. We utilize classical color dropout method in $z$ and $Y$ bands to select primary quasar candidates, followed up with Bayesian selection method to identify quasars. We show that overall selection completeness $> 80\%$ and efficiency $\sim 10\%$ at $6.5<z<9$, with 180 quasars at $z>6.5$, 20 at $z > 7.5$ and 2 at $z > 8.5$. The quasar yields depend sensitively on the assumed quasar luminosity shape and redshift evolution. Brown dwarf rejection through proper motion up to 50$\%$ can be made for stars brighter than 25 mag, low-$z$ galaxies dominate at fainter magnitude. Our results show that Roman/Rubin are able to discover a statistical sample of the earliest and faintest quasars in the Universe. The new valuable datasets worth follow up studies with James Webb Space Telescope and Extremely Large Telescopes, to determine quasar luminosity function faint end slope and constraint the supermassive black holes growth in the early Universe.

2.Constraining Circumgalactic Turbulence with QSO Absorption-line Measurements

Authors:Brad Koplitz, Edward Buie II, Evan Scannapieco

Abstract: Our knowledge of the circumgalactic medium (CGM) is mostly based on quasar absorption-line measurements. These have uncovered a multiphase medium that is likely highly turbulent, but constraints of this turbulence are limited to measurements of the non-thermal width of absorption-line components ($b_{turb}$) and the line-of-sight velocity dispersion between components ($\sigma_{LOS}$). Here we analyze a suite of CGM simulations to determine how well these indirect measures are related to the underlying CGM. Our simulations track the non-equilibrium evolution of all commonly observed ions, and consist of two main types: small-scale simulations of regions of homogeneous CGM turbulence and global simulations of inhomogeneous turbulence throughout a galactic halo. From each simulation, we generate mock spectra of Si II, Si IV, C IV, and O VI, which allow us to directly compare $b_{turb}$ and $\sigma_{LOS}$ to the true line-of-sight turbulence ($\sigma_{1D}$). In the small-scale simulations, $b_{turb}$ is only weakly correlated with $\sigma_{1D}$, likely because it measures random motions within individual warm CGM clouds, which do not sample the overall random motions. Meanwhile, $\sigma_{LOS}$ and $\sigma_{1D}$ are strongly correlated, with $\sigma_{1D}\approx\sigma_{LOS}+10$ km s$^{-1}$ in the densest regions we simulated, though, the strength of this correlation depended weakly on the gas phase being probed. Our large-scale simulations also indicate that $b_{turb}$ and $\sigma_{1D}$ are largely uncorrelated, and that $\sigma_{1D}\approx\sigma_{LOS}+10$ kms$^{-1}$ on average, although it varies along individual sightlines. Moreover, the $\sigma_\mathrm{LOS}$ distributions from our global simulations are similar to recent observations, suggesting that this quantity may provide useful constraints on circumgalactic turbulence regardless of the axis probed.