arXiv daily

Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)

Mon, 31 Jul 2023

Other arXiv digests in this category:Thu, 14 Sep 2023; Wed, 13 Sep 2023; Tue, 12 Sep 2023; Mon, 11 Sep 2023; Fri, 08 Sep 2023; Tue, 05 Sep 2023; Fri, 01 Sep 2023; Thu, 31 Aug 2023; Wed, 30 Aug 2023; Tue, 29 Aug 2023; Mon, 28 Aug 2023; Fri, 25 Aug 2023; Thu, 24 Aug 2023; Wed, 23 Aug 2023; Tue, 22 Aug 2023; Mon, 21 Aug 2023; Fri, 18 Aug 2023; Thu, 17 Aug 2023; Wed, 16 Aug 2023; Tue, 15 Aug 2023; Mon, 14 Aug 2023; Fri, 11 Aug 2023; Thu, 10 Aug 2023; Wed, 09 Aug 2023; Tue, 08 Aug 2023; Mon, 07 Aug 2023; Fri, 04 Aug 2023; Thu, 03 Aug 2023; Wed, 02 Aug 2023; Tue, 01 Aug 2023; Fri, 28 Jul 2023; Thu, 27 Jul 2023; Wed, 26 Jul 2023; Tue, 25 Jul 2023; Mon, 24 Jul 2023; Fri, 21 Jul 2023; Wed, 19 Jul 2023; Tue, 18 Jul 2023; Mon, 17 Jul 2023; Fri, 14 Jul 2023; Thu, 13 Jul 2023; Wed, 12 Jul 2023; Tue, 11 Jul 2023; Mon, 10 Jul 2023; Fri, 07 Jul 2023; Thu, 06 Jul 2023; Wed, 05 Jul 2023; Tue, 04 Jul 2023; Mon, 03 Jul 2023; Fri, 30 Jun 2023; Thu, 29 Jun 2023; Wed, 28 Jun 2023; Tue, 27 Jun 2023; Mon, 26 Jun 2023; Fri, 23 Jun 2023; Thu, 22 Jun 2023; Wed, 21 Jun 2023; Tue, 20 Jun 2023; Fri, 16 Jun 2023; Thu, 15 Jun 2023; Tue, 13 Jun 2023; Mon, 12 Jun 2023; Fri, 09 Jun 2023; Thu, 08 Jun 2023; Wed, 07 Jun 2023; Tue, 06 Jun 2023; Mon, 05 Jun 2023; Fri, 02 Jun 2023; Thu, 01 Jun 2023; Wed, 31 May 2023; Tue, 30 May 2023; Mon, 29 May 2023; Fri, 26 May 2023; Thu, 25 May 2023; Wed, 24 May 2023; Tue, 23 May 2023; Mon, 22 May 2023; Fri, 19 May 2023; Thu, 18 May 2023; Wed, 17 May 2023; Tue, 16 May 2023; Mon, 15 May 2023; Fri, 12 May 2023; Thu, 11 May 2023; Wed, 10 May 2023; Tue, 09 May 2023; Mon, 08 May 2023; Fri, 05 May 2023; Thu, 04 May 2023; Wed, 03 May 2023; Tue, 02 May 2023; Mon, 01 May 2023; Fri, 28 Apr 2023; Thu, 27 Apr 2023; Wed, 26 Apr 2023; Tue, 25 Apr 2023; Mon, 24 Apr 2023; Fri, 21 Apr 2023; Thu, 20 Apr 2023; Wed, 19 Apr 2023; Tue, 18 Apr 2023; Mon, 17 Apr 2023; Fri, 14 Apr 2023; Thu, 13 Apr 2023; Wed, 12 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Mon, 10 Apr 2023
1.Deep learning forecasts of cosmic acceleration parameters from DECi-hertz Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory

Authors:Meng-Fei Sun, Jin Li, Shuo Cao, Xiaolin Liu

Abstract: Validating the accelerating expansion of the universe is an important issue for understanding the evolution of the universe. By constraining the cosmic acceleration parameter $X_H$, we can discriminate between the $\Lambda \mathrm{CDM}$ (cosmological constant plus cold dark matter) model and LTB (the Lema\^itre-Tolman-Bondi) model. In this paper, we explore the possibility of constraining the cosmic acceleration parameter with the inspiral gravitational waveform of neutron star binaries (NSBs) in the frequency range of 0.1Hz-10Hz, which can be detected by the second-generation space-based gravitational wave detector DECIGO. We use a convolutional neural network (CNN), a long short-term memory (LSTM) network combined with a gated recurrent unit (GRU), and Fisher information matrix to derive constraints on the cosmic acceleration parameter $X_H$. Based on the simulated gravitational wave data with a time duration of 1 month, we conclude that CNN can limit the relative error to 14.09%, while LSTM network combined with GRU can limit the relative error to 13.53%. Additionally, using Fisher information matrix for gravitational wave data with a 5-year observation can limit the relative error to 32.94%. Compared with the Fisher information matrix method, deep learning techniques will significantly improve the constraints on the cosmic acceleration parameters at different redshifts. Therefore, DECIGO is expected to provide direct measurements of the acceleration of the universe, by observing the chirp signals of coalescing binary neutron stars.

2.Constraining a companion of the galactic center black hole, Sgr A*

Authors:Clifford M. Will, Smadar Naoz, Aurélien Hees, Alexandria Tucker, Eric Zhang, Tuan Do, Andrea Ghez

Abstract: We use 23 years of astrometric and radial velocity data on the orbit of the star S0-2 to constrain a hypothetical intermediate-mass black hole orbiting the massive black hole Sgr A* at the Galactic center. The data place upper limits on variations of the orientation of the stellar orbit (inclination, nodal angle, and pericenter) at levels between 0.02 and 0.07 degrees per year. We use a combination of analytic estimates and full numerical integrations of the orbit of S0-2 in the presence of a black-hole binary. For a companion IMBH whose semi-major axis $a_c$ is larger than that of S0-2 (1020 a.u.), we find that in the region between 1000 and 4000 a.u., a companion black hole with mass $m_c$ between $10^3$ and $10^5 M_\odot$ is excluded, with a boundary behaving as $a_c \sim m_c^{1/3}$. For a companion with $a_c < 1020$ a.u., we find that a black hole with mass between $10^3$ and $10^5 \, M_\odot$ is again excluded, with a boundary behaving as $a_c \sim m_c^{-1/2}$. These bounds arise from quadrupolar perturbations of the orbit of S0-2. However, significantly stronger bounds on the mass of an inner companion arise from the fact that the location of S0-2 is measured relative to the bright emission of Sgr A*. As a consequence, that separation is perturbed by the ``wobble'' of Sgr A* about the center of mass between it and the companion, leading to ``apparent'' perturbations of S0-2's orbit that also include a dipole component. The result is a set of bounds as small as $400 \, M_\odot$ at 200 a.u.; the numerical simulations suggest a bound from these effects varying as $a_c \sim m_c^{-1}$. We compare and contrast our results with those from a recent analysis by the GRAVITY collaboration.

3.Effects of Grain Magnetic Properties and Grain Growth on Synthetic Dust Polarization of MHD Simulations in Protostellar Environments

Authors:Nguyen Chau Giang, Thiem Hoang

Abstract: Thermal dust polarization is a powerful tool to probe magnetic fields ($\textbf{B}$), grain magnetic properties, and grain sizes. However, a systematic study of the dependence of synthetic dust polarization on grain properties in protostellar environments is not yet available. In this paper, we post-process a non-ideal MHD simulation of a collapsing protostellar core with our updated POLARIS to study in detail the effects of grain magnetic properties and grain growth on dust polarization. We found that superparamagnetic (SPM) grains can produce high polarization degree $p \sim 10-40\%$ beyond $\sim 500$ au because of their efficient magnetic alignment by magnetically enhanced Radiative Torque (MRAT) mechanism. The magnetic field tangling due to turbulence in the envelope causes the decrease of $p$ with emission intensity $I$ as $p\propto I^{\alpha}$ with the slope $\alpha \sim -0.3$. But within 500 au, SPM grains tend to have weak internal alignment and be aligned with $\textbf{B}$ by RAdiative Torque mechanism only, producing lower $p \sim 1\%$ and larger $\alpha \sim -0.6$. For paramagnetic (PM) grains, their inefficient magnetic alignment produces $p << 1\%$, and the depolarization happens with a steep slope of $\alpha \sim -0.9$ owing to the alignment loss of large grains toward the protostar. Grain growth can help to increase $p$ and weaken the depolarization effect caused by turbulence beyond $500$ au for SPM grains. But for SPM grains within $\sim 500$ au and for PM grains, increasing $a_{\rm max}$ enhances the depolarization effect due to the increasing amount of large grains with inefficient alignment. Finally, we found that the polarization angle dispersion function $S$ increases with increasing iron inclusions and $a_{\rm max}$. Our findings reveal the dependence of magnetic field strength measured using the Davis-Chandrashekhar-Fermi technique on grain alignment degree.

4.The intrinsic X-ray luminosity distribution of an optically-selected SDSS quasar population

Authors:Amy L. Rankine, James Aird, Angel Ruiz, Antonis Georgakakis

Abstract: In active galactic nuclei, the relationship between UV and X-ray luminosity is well studied (often characterised by $\alpha_\text{ox}$) but often with heterogeneous samples. We have parametrized the intrinsic distribution of X-ray luminosity, $L_\text{X}$, for the optically-selected sample of SDSS quasars in the Stripe 82 and XXL fields across redshifts 0.5-3.5. We make use of the available XMM observations and a custom pipeline to produce Bayesian sensitivity curves that are used to derive the intrinsic X-ray distribution in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. We find that the X-ray luminosity distribution is well described by a Gaussian function in ${\log_{10}}L_\text{X}$ space with a mean that is dependent on the monochromatic 2500A UV luminosity, $L_{2500}$. We also observe some redshift dependence of the distribution. The mean of the $L_\text{X}$ distribution increases with redshift while the width decreases. This weak but significant redshift dependence leads to $L_{2500}$-$L_\text{X}$ and $L_{2500}$-$\alpha_\text{ox}$ relations that evolve with redshift, and we produce a redshift- and $L_{2500}$-dependent $\alpha_\text{ox}$ equation. The increasing average black hole mass with redshift in our sample points to black hole mass as a potential driver of the redshift evolution.