arXiv daily

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Tue, 04 Jul 2023

Other arXiv digests in this category:Thu, 14 Sep 2023; Wed, 13 Sep 2023; Tue, 12 Sep 2023; Mon, 11 Sep 2023; Fri, 08 Sep 2023; Tue, 05 Sep 2023; Fri, 01 Sep 2023; Thu, 31 Aug 2023; Wed, 30 Aug 2023; Tue, 29 Aug 2023; Mon, 28 Aug 2023; Fri, 25 Aug 2023; Thu, 24 Aug 2023; Wed, 23 Aug 2023; Tue, 22 Aug 2023; Mon, 21 Aug 2023; Fri, 18 Aug 2023; Thu, 17 Aug 2023; Wed, 16 Aug 2023; Tue, 15 Aug 2023; Mon, 14 Aug 2023; Fri, 11 Aug 2023; Thu, 10 Aug 2023; Wed, 09 Aug 2023; Tue, 08 Aug 2023; Mon, 07 Aug 2023; Fri, 04 Aug 2023; Thu, 03 Aug 2023; Wed, 02 Aug 2023; Tue, 01 Aug 2023; Mon, 31 Jul 2023; Fri, 28 Jul 2023; Thu, 27 Jul 2023; Wed, 26 Jul 2023; Tue, 25 Jul 2023; Mon, 24 Jul 2023; Fri, 21 Jul 2023; Thu, 20 Jul 2023; Wed, 19 Jul 2023; Tue, 18 Jul 2023; Mon, 17 Jul 2023; Fri, 14 Jul 2023; Thu, 13 Jul 2023; Wed, 12 Jul 2023; Tue, 11 Jul 2023; Mon, 10 Jul 2023; Fri, 07 Jul 2023; Thu, 06 Jul 2023; Wed, 05 Jul 2023; Mon, 03 Jul 2023; Fri, 30 Jun 2023; Thu, 29 Jun 2023; Wed, 28 Jun 2023; Tue, 27 Jun 2023; Mon, 26 Jun 2023; Fri, 23 Jun 2023; Thu, 22 Jun 2023; Wed, 21 Jun 2023; Tue, 20 Jun 2023; Fri, 16 Jun 2023; Thu, 15 Jun 2023; Tue, 13 Jun 2023; Mon, 12 Jun 2023; Fri, 09 Jun 2023; Thu, 08 Jun 2023; Wed, 07 Jun 2023; Tue, 06 Jun 2023; Mon, 05 Jun 2023; Fri, 02 Jun 2023; Thu, 01 Jun 2023; Wed, 31 May 2023; Tue, 30 May 2023; Mon, 29 May 2023; Fri, 26 May 2023; Thu, 25 May 2023; Wed, 24 May 2023; Tue, 23 May 2023; Mon, 22 May 2023; Fri, 19 May 2023; Thu, 18 May 2023; Wed, 17 May 2023; Tue, 16 May 2023; Mon, 15 May 2023; Fri, 12 May 2023; Thu, 11 May 2023; Wed, 10 May 2023; Tue, 09 May 2023; Mon, 08 May 2023; Fri, 05 May 2023; Thu, 04 May 2023; Wed, 03 May 2023; Tue, 02 May 2023; Mon, 01 May 2023; Fri, 28 Apr 2023; Thu, 27 Apr 2023; Wed, 26 Apr 2023; Tue, 25 Apr 2023; Mon, 24 Apr 2023; Fri, 21 Apr 2023; Thu, 20 Apr 2023; Wed, 19 Apr 2023; Tue, 18 Apr 2023; Mon, 17 Apr 2023; Fri, 14 Apr 2023; Thu, 13 Apr 2023; Wed, 12 Apr 2023; Tue, 11 Apr 2023; Mon, 10 Apr 2023
1.Analyzing the vulnerabilities in SplitFed Learning: Assessing the robustness against Data Poisoning Attacks

Authors:Aysha Thahsin Zahir Ismail, Raj Mani Shukla

Abstract: Distributed Collaborative Machine Learning (DCML) is a potential alternative to address the privacy concerns associated with centralized machine learning. The Split learning (SL) and Federated Learning (FL) are the two effective learning approaches in DCML. Recently there have been an increased interest on the hybrid of FL and SL known as the SplitFed Learning (SFL). This research is the earliest attempt to study, analyze and present the impact of data poisoning attacks in SFL. We propose three kinds of novel attack strategies namely untargeted, targeted and distance-based attacks for SFL. All the attacks strategies aim to degrade the performance of the DCML-based classifier. We test the proposed attack strategies for two different case studies on Electrocardiogram signal classification and automatic handwritten digit recognition. A series of attack experiments were conducted by varying the percentage of malicious clients and the choice of the model split layer between the clients and the server. The results after the comprehensive analysis of attack strategies clearly convey that untargeted and distance-based poisoning attacks have greater impacts in evading the classifier outcomes compared to targeted attacks in SFL

2.Free energy of Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network with Skip Connection

Authors:Shuya Nagayasu, Sumio Watanabe

Abstract: Since the success of Residual Network(ResNet), many of architectures of Convolutional Neural Networks(CNNs) have adopted skip connection. While the generalization performance of CNN with skip connection has been explained within the framework of Ensemble Learning, the dependency on the number of parameters have not been revealed. In this paper, we show that Bayesian free energy of Convolutional Neural Network both with and without skip connection in Bayesian learning. The upper bound of free energy of Bayesian CNN with skip connection does not depend on the oveparametrization and, the generalization error of Bayesian CNN has similar property.

3.Generative Flow Networks: a Markov Chain Perspective

Authors:Tristan Deleu, Yoshua Bengio

Abstract: While Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (MCMC) provide a general framework to sample from a probability distribution defined up to normalization, they often suffer from slow convergence to the target distribution when the latter is highly multi-modal. Recently, Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) have been proposed as an alternative framework to mitigate this issue when samples have a clear compositional structure, by treating sampling as a sequential decision making problem. Although they were initially introduced from the perspective of flow networks, the recent advances of GFlowNets draw more and more inspiration from the Markov chain literature, bypassing completely the need for flows. In this paper, we formalize this connection and offer a new perspective for GFlowNets using Markov chains, showing a unifying view for GFlowNets regardless of the nature of the state space as recurrent Markov chains. Positioning GFlowNets under the same theoretical framework as MCMC methods also allows us to identify the similarities between both frameworks, and most importantly to highlight their

4.Learning to Branch in Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Pointer Networks

Authors:Rui Wang, Zhiming Zhou, Tao Zhang, Ling Wang, Xin Xu, Xiangke Liao, Kaiwen Li

Abstract: Branch-and-bound is a typical way to solve combinatorial optimization problems. This paper proposes a graph pointer network model for learning the variable selection policy in the branch-and-bound. We extract the graph features, global features and historical features to represent the solver state. The proposed model, which combines the graph neural network and the pointer mechanism, can effectively map from the solver state to the branching variable decisions. The model is trained to imitate the classic strong branching expert rule by a designed top-k Kullback-Leibler divergence loss function. Experiments on a series of benchmark problems demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly outperforms the widely used expert-designed branching rules. Our approach also outperforms the state-of-the-art machine-learning-based branch-and-bound methods in terms of solving speed and search tree size on all the test instances. In addition, the model can generalize to unseen instances and scale to larger instances.

5.TablEye: Seeing small Tables through the Lens of Images

Authors:Seung-eon Lee, Sang-Chul Lee

Abstract: The exploration of few-shot tabular learning becomes imperative. Tabular data is a versatile representation that captures diverse information, yet it is not exempt from limitations, property of data and model size. Labeling extensive tabular data can be challenging, and it may not be feasible to capture every important feature. Few-shot tabular learning, however, remains relatively unexplored, primarily due to scarcity of shared information among independent datasets and the inherent ambiguity in defining boundaries within tabular data. To the best of our knowledge, no meaningful and unrestricted few-shot tabular learning techniques have been developed without imposing constraints on the dataset. In this paper, we propose an innovative framework called TablEye, which aims to overcome the limit of forming prior knowledge for tabular data by adopting domain transformation. It facilitates domain transformation by generating tabular images, which effectively conserve the intrinsic semantics of the original tabular data. This approach harnesses rigorously tested few-shot learning algorithms and embedding functions to acquire and apply prior knowledge. Leveraging shared data domains allows us to utilize this prior knowledge, originally learned from the image domain. Specifically, TablEye demonstrated a superior performance by outstripping the TabLLM in a 4-shot task with a maximum 0.11 AUC and a STUNT in a 1- shot setting, where it led on average by 3.17% accuracy.

6.Causal Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Authors:Zhihong Deng, Jing Jiang, Guodong Long, Chengqi Zhang

Abstract: Reinforcement learning is an essential paradigm for solving sequential decision problems under uncertainty. Despite many remarkable achievements in recent decades, applying reinforcement learning methods in the real world remains challenging. One of the main obstacles is that reinforcement learning agents lack a fundamental understanding of the world and must therefore learn from scratch through numerous trial-and-error interactions. They may also face challenges in providing explanations for their decisions and generalizing the acquired knowledge. Causality, however, offers a notable advantage as it can formalize knowledge in a systematic manner and leverage invariance for effective knowledge transfer. This has led to the emergence of causal reinforcement learning, a subfield of reinforcement learning that seeks to enhance existing algorithms by incorporating causal relationships into the learning process. In this survey, we comprehensively review the literature on causal reinforcement learning. We first introduce the basic concepts of causality and reinforcement learning, and then explain how causality can address core challenges in non-causal reinforcement learning. We categorize and systematically review existing causal reinforcement learning approaches based on their target problems and methodologies. Finally, we outline open issues and future directions in this emerging field.