Effective Proxy for Human Labeling: Ensemble Disagreement Scores in Large Language Models for Industrial NLP

Avatar
Poster
Voices Powered byElevenlabs logo
Connected to paperThis paper is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review

Effective Proxy for Human Labeling: Ensemble Disagreement Scores in Large Language Models for Industrial NLP

Authors

Wei Du, Laksh Advani, Yashmeet Gambhir, Daniel J Perry, Prashant Shiralkar, Zhengzheng Xing, Aaron Colak

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capability to generalize across a large number of NLP tasks. For industry applications, it is imperative to assess the performance of the LLM on unlabeled production data from time to time to validate for a real-world setting. Human labeling to assess model error requires considerable expense and time delay. Here we demonstrate that ensemble disagreement scores work well as a proxy for human labeling for language models in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuned settings, per our evaluation on keyphrase extraction (KPE) task. We measure fidelity of the results by comparing to true error measured from human labeled ground truth. We contrast with the alternative of using another LLM as a source of machine labels, or silver labels. Results across various languages and domains show disagreement scores provide a better estimation of model performance with mean average error (MAE) as low as 0.4% and on average 13.8% better than using silver labels.

Follow Us on

0 comments

Add comment